Picture
I have been thinking about family history research and genealogy quite a lot since I wrote I Don't Wanna Be a Genealogist. I made some points in that article about 21st century researchers and some observations of the genealogy community.

Additionally, over the past year I have read several articles that have been written by a small number of professional genealogists with some interesting insights into amateurs, hobbyists, as well as bloggers of genealogy. Some of these insights had a condescending point of view. And quite critical because amateurs weren't doing things the "proper" way.  There have been some eloquent online responses. But mine is simple: Did any of you have children? Were you as critical of your children because they were doing something new and didn't do it "right"?  Unless you were a mean parent, probably not.

On a separate note, I have four websites - two of which are family history sites, Braunhart Mania, and Marksology. The other two are sites that have short articles that present my thoughts on the world of research as well as some simple "how to's." One of these sites is retired and the other is fairly new, The Ancestor Hunt, which is this site.

I use some well-known online software tools that allow me to build these websites. As part of that software there is the ability to blog. But because I use this software doesn't mean I am a blogger. And because I write articles on my websites using blogging software doesn't make me less of a writer.

I don't care if you are a CG or APG or AG. I also don’t care if you are new at this and making mistakes. We all are seeking our family history. I don't like labels, whether they are hard earned certifications or arbitrary monikers such as "amateur" or "hobbyist." I don't like being called a Blogger either, because inherent in that title is unstated negative connotations such as "not really a writer" or "not really a serious genealogist."

So can we please stop with the labels?

Some people research their family history; some people write about it; others teach it and a few others even have made it their living. Some have well developed skills and some are just learning. They all deserve equal respect.

So the moral of the story is:

Call me Kenneth.  I research my family history and write about it - on my websites. I don't consider myself an expert in research or writing - but I am pretty good at it. So, do not label me - you do not have the right to do so.  You don't even know me.

But if you must – SOB works sometimes.

 


Comments

11/29/2012 12:47pm

I agree! Lots of pros know how to squeeze you for a dime but rarely know more than the family historian who has been doing research for more years than some of them have lived.

Reply
11/29/2012 2:19pm

Jack,

Thanks for dropping by. I have not had a contractual relationship with a professional genealogist, so I can't speak regarding a business experience. But their are a few who seem to have a dim view of new researchers and that is unfortunate.

Kenneth

Reply
11/29/2012 12:54pm

THANK YOU, KENNETH! As someone who would likely be labeled among the amateur/ hobbyist/drive-by genealogist, I so very much appreciate this post. I understand the frustration of the issues that have created some of the articles and blog posts, etc that have really set off this firestorm of branding and such. But by making individuals like myself, and potentially new family researchers who may hold keys for us all or just the flame to carry on to the next generation, feel less welcome and intimidated to be involved can not be beneficial to the industry or the movement of genealogy. Thank you!

Reply
11/29/2012 2:21pm

Hi Jodi,

There are millions and millions of non-professionals out there who are just trying to get a little research accomplished. It does no good for people to criticize others that they do not know. A professional should act professionally and help those who are new to researching in my view.

Kenneth

Reply
11/30/2012 3:09pm

While I appreciate the 'No Labels' sentiment, I think it is nearly impossible to achieve. Particularly for analytical type folks like myself. We like to sort, label and catagorize. We do it in our research all the time, or even just in our closets and pantries. It's how we make sense of our world.

But the point your making, that often those labels are used to demean and degrade the interests and contributions of individuals or entire groups is spot on. We can, and should do better.

Your reply to Jodi, "A professional should act professionally and help those who are new to researching in my view", sums up my initial emotional reaction to the Moody article.

Good writing and best of luck.

Reply
11/30/2012 4:26pm

Rorey,

Thanks for visiting.

You got my point, which is the main thing.

I think you realize that I am not talking about labeling closets or pantries. I am talking about labeling people - and in the family history world it is harmful for experienced folks to use labels to appear "above the masses."

There are over 10 million people in the world seeking their family history and I guess less than 5,000 with any kind of credentials. It is incumbent upon us humans to welcome newcomers. In my view we should make a special effort to do so, because it benefits everyone.

I an glad you agree - we need more "agreers" and less "disagreers"

Kenneth

Reply
12/01/2012 2:01am

I like history, I like digging, I like digging into histories of families, I LOVE what you had to say about labels. I qualify for a bunch of the tags you have here, I just don't like to be called by any of them. I'm just Jan.

Reply
12/01/2012 8:20am

Jan,

Thanks for visiting. I'm glad this article resonated with you.

Kenneth

Reply
12/04/2012 12:59pm

Hi, Kenneth! Absolutely I share your aversion to labels. There are so many ways in this world for people to "put down" one another, often to make themselves feel more important. Why should we cultivate more methods of condescension. I've always believed that people are at their best when they are cooperating and supporting each other, because that bonding brings out the best in people -- and in the end, produces more knowledge and the "civilized" part of civilization. I just finished reading Steven Pinker's "The Better Angels of Our Nature" for my book club. He makes the same point about reason, cooperation, civilization, except with manymany more words.

Human nature being what it is, though, Utopia will not come tomorrow, In genealogy (as in academics) there will always be a contingent of scolds and pedants. They see themselves as trying to uphold standards. That's OK, and forgivable. We can be who we are and let their chatter roll off of us. I'm glad you have a more expansive view of people and their endeavors. Live and let live.

Reply
12/04/2012 2:41pm

Thanks, Mariann. Upholding standards is acceptable of course. But genealogy by and large is a past-time, and someone "new" who is attempting to have fun at a new and rewarding hobby shouldn't be put down because they upload an improper tree or aren't educated enough to write a proper footnote or citation. That is my biggest gripe.

"Girls (and boys) just wanna have fun"

Thanks again,

Kenneth

Reply
Annick
12/05/2012 8:50am

I have little letters after my name, but never make a fuss about them because I have found so many people in my field, without those little letters, who have a great deal more experience and expertise than I have. As far as genealogy is concerned, I am very new at it and have found SO MUCH help on many genealogy blogs and from the bloggers themselves. Please keep doing what you all do so well and don't let the roten apples in the bunch spoil everyone's fun in their ancestor's quest.

Reply
12/05/2012 10:39am

Annick,

Thanks for visiting.

Yes - fun is what it is all about IMO.

Kenneth

Reply
12/11/2012 2:54pm

Well, I'm late to the party (as per usual) but I'm glad I came. Excellent post, Kenneth. I can hear your frustration in this situation, and its one I share. As many have already stated, a great number of the labels you have included would apply to me, as well.
I learned early in my "professional genealogy" transition that there are many with these attitudes, and I received two pieces of advice: "ignore them completely" or "be able to learn without judging them in return". I chose the latter. Although they are not always the most welcoming (whether that is intentional or not), they do, most of the time, have something of value to share. So, I watch, I listen, I think. I take what I can that will be of benefit and leave the rest.
Only by example will we change, as a community. I'm part of that "younger" genealogy crowd - yes, another label that certainly carries its own heavy burden - and I look forward to watching as we grow as a group, hopefully, away from the hierarchy of "classes".
Best of luck in what you pursue, which is simply this: respect.
~Jen

Reply
12/11/2012 3:17pm

Thanks Jen for your thoughtful comments. For one, I do not seek anything out of this endeavor, whether it be respect or anything else. I seek one and only one thing - fun. I started this on a whim and soon became fairly serious about honoring my ancestors. And that is all. I wrote this article because I had read several articles as well as comments on social media from folks who were quite critical of new researchers and I have witnessed and heard from those "newbies" who were quite taken aback by the criticism.

No one "owns" genealogy and family history. Some may have more experience than others, but that does not give them the right to criticize others in public. Ever! Nor does it give them the right to make it such that others get so turned off by the criticism that they quit searching.

And that is my point.

Reply
LeAnn Knifer Atkin
02/26/2013 7:33pm

Thank you Kenneth! ...and I am just LeAnn. A person who loves genealogy and the history of my family. I am proud of all of them and proud of the examples they set for me. Wish I had the same courage they had, but I continue to strive, work at life and work at what I love to do. No initials behind my name or titles, several people call me Mom and other's Nana! I love them all!

Reply
03/04/2013 10:40am

Thank you for visiting LeAnn. I agree with your comments!

Reply



Leave a Reply